ISOPRENE DREAMS

Search This Blog

Saturday, May 23, 2009

If It's Fast Food Movie Franchise You Want: Look No Further Than "Terminator: Salvation"




TERMINATOR: SALVATION is an abomination to the franchise. Allow me to suggest that you should not suspect otherwise.

I read one thing in the paper yesterday that suggested "the critics liked it" -(?) -- it garnered an astonishing Two And A Half stars in our local rag - - (!!) -- with a caveat that "it has no heart" -- well there's a shocker for ya -- I don't need to be reminded that a piece of waste matter like that has no cardiovascular system -- its a redundancy I can do without, thanks -- here's a movie that deserves not one whit more than a ZERO STAR rating, in my opinion.


How on earth anyone--a professional critic or otherwise--could possibly give this movie more than zero stars is beyond me. This sorry excuse for a Terminator movie is firing on all chambers when it comes to missing the mark.

There is no shred of a plot with any grounded sense of coherence whatsoever. The director McG's notion of a plot can be summed up in a name, "John Connor." Oh wait, I forgot--there is a twist. (Don't worry about spoilers--It would be quite difficult to spoil this for you, and I don't mean that in a cheeky way. I literally mean that it is impossible for something without any meat, to be spoiled. So read on. The "tweest" is "Kyle Reese." Just throw in another iconic sounding character name with which an awestruck silence is generated every time its mentioned, and there you have it: the totality of this movie's plot (and don't ask me for an explanation, the movie offers none).

And just as bad as there being no plot to speak of, is the excruciatingly unfortunate realization that the setting, nearly a decade in the future (2018, from the date of this review), has no visionary qualities, and I have to point out here that it isn't for any potentially noble reason such as having accurately predicted that not much will change in 9 years; no. It's because they filmed this with what must have been McG and crew's own jeeps and equipment. Throw some military camo netting and things bought on sale at your local army surplus store, and wala -!- you have "Terminator: Salvation". When all the dust settles, you sit there blinking in astonishment that there really wasn't one worthy thing about this movie. No awesome future setting. No fully realized terminator army. Just a few badly strewn-together props with stale, cheesy dialog attempting to support them.

But the movie did have some thought put into it. There is the token ragamuffin 9 year old girl with the nappy hair (check); her charming, teenaged companion with the mystery persona (check); and their god-given ability to pop out of nowhere with a convenient remote triggering device to blow up titanic renegade Terminators at a moment's notice (check).

This movie is far less than the sum of its assembly of parts. Assembled entirely from every genre movie that came before it--you betcha. I kid you not: if you were to painstakingly eliminate each and every scene and reference to a previous movie (Mad Max, Road Warrior, Terminators, etc) you would be left with nothing. It is that unoriginal.

So here's the deal. I've warned you not to waste your time and money and consciousness seeing this, and I meant it. Seeing as how I happen to know that this is suposed to be a special installment or continuation of a franchise that means a lot to us, I don't expect you to take my word for it. I know how it is. You want to find out for yourself; hell, you need to. I understand. So let's make a deal.

Halfway through the movie, the only thought running through my head was "I should lead a revolt of audience members to the box office demanding our money back". Lord, do I ever wish I had at least tried. To do so, I would naturally have had to begin hurling obscenities at the screen, and I didn't because, well, I didn't want to ruin the possibility that others might be, *cough* enjoying themselves *wince*. Do I ever regret that, now.

When the ultimate slap to the face arrives (the end credits), you too will wish YOU had been the leader of such a noble revolt. So NOW you have the opportunity handed to you on a silver platter! I beseech thee all--should you feel that you must discover for yourselves how bad this movie really is--someone must take the responsibility to just yell out midway through this cinematic miscarriage "THIS SUX!" with their fist in the air, and I can't imagine nobody else in the theater agreeing or muttering their sympathetic consent. TAKE the opportunity to leap to your feet and look wildly around you. FIND the people frozen in their seats with eyes glazed over---decent people like you and me who have obviously invested their hope, high expectations, valuable time, and hard-earned money--SNAP them awake to the realization that WE DON'T DESERVE THIS from Hollywood! Shout out dramatically "LET'S GO GET OUR MONEY BACK, PEOPLE" and lead their way out of that theater and to the front lobby. To quote a much better movie, "You can do it!"

I want to read about it in the papers, how good people in several midwestern states ROSE UP and DEMANDED their money back. Because if we all just sit there like sheep stunned into submission--then we deserve yet another prefabricated, derivative installment shoved down our throats. Let this be a lesson to all who would blunder into a theater to see a movie by someone named McG. If its zero nutrition fast food movie franchise features that you want--then you know where to line up.

TERMINATOR: SALVATION opened in theaters nationwide Thursday, May 21st, 2009.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Hell Ride





This movie grabs you by the collar, slices your throat from ear to ear, pours gasoline all over your sputtering, confused face, and throws a lit match on you. You're done. You just been slapped upside the head with Larry Bishop's return to the exploitation biker flick, courtesy of Quentin Tarantino Presents. Did you bother looking up the 11% rating on Rottentomatoes? Well, so what. Consensus reviews from this day and age for this type of movie don't mean squat. But I'll tell you what does: This monster of hellbound biker mayhem stars Michael Madsen, Vinnie Jones, David Carradine, and Dennis Hopper riding straight to hell on their choppers. The people dumb enough to argue this is a bad movie are really wasting their time. Go rent Pineapple Express or Baghead or something, eviscerate those to your little heart's content. There's plenty of punching bags in Hollywood that deserve it way more than this small labor of love. Not that it can't handle it. Hell, it'll spit out a broken tooth and still be standing there, grinning at you. This movie is true to a lost aesthetic. To coin a phrase that can't be overused, this here movie is Not For You, if you're not already into sleazy exploitation flicks from the 70s. Just steer clear of this lean and mean nasty biking b-movie machine, ya hear. Every chick in this thing looks like she stepped out of the pages of a glossy men's magazine, I'm not saying this is a great standard or anything, just that this is a real, down and dirty, exploitation grindhouse biker movie, from 2008. This movie will deliver the goods as long as you sit through it to the end. Yes it has its flaws, some of the acting is plain bad, and some reviewers have complained about the dialog, that its unrealistic. Well whupteedoo, how about that. I myself thought the surrealistic, often rhyming dialog was funny, it had me cracking up all over the place. Of course people don't talk like that, not unless they're having an unusually good time under the influence of certain spirits. So you can see, this movie is not going to fit into the mainstream. This is a good thing to me. This movie reinstates my faith that badassery still might have a place in Hollywood. We can thank Quentin Tarantino for that. How in the everloving hell this movie squeaks by with an R rating while other movies with less sex and violence have to keep cutting down scenes to stay away from the dread NC-17 is beyond me, but if I were to guess, I'd figure that maybe the ratings board is OK with *spoiler* slicing wide open pretty women's throats and pouring gasoline over them burning them alive and bleeding, so long as its in the context of an exploitation film. Any regular movie would never get away with this, but somehow Larry Bishop and/or Quentin Tarantino can push it through the censors without getting so much as a peep outta them. Maybe Quentin greased their palms, I don't know. All I know is this is one revved up mother of a revenge movie, and according to it, revenge ain't best served cold. Uh-uh. Revenge comes screaming in the form of tattooed bikers from hell out to kill you. Vinnie Jones as "Billy Wings" cuts a massive and ruthless figure with his pneumatic arrow rifle at hand. Larry Bishop himself is somewhat of a revelation as Pistolero, the prez of a biker gang called the Victors. Madsen is at his coolest portraying their Numero Uno Killer, The Gent. Wait'll you get a load of The Gent in action. Try not to blink, or you'll miss him gun down 5 guys. He is sick in this. And newcomer Eric Balfour (of the TV show 24) plays the keystone role in this revenge story. He holds his own amidst an all star cast, providing a youthful, feral vengeance that was quite satisfying for me to watch. And the bike he rides is badass: its a classic Indian with a suicide clutch, specially made old school for the movie. There's another reason to watch this flick, the bikes alone are worth admiring. Alright I've said enough about the movie itself. Go and rent this thing. Hell, buy it, support grindhouse cinema. I know I will.

Larry Bishop kinda owes Tarantino big time. But the cool thing is this. Larry takes Quentin's goodwill (and hard money) and just lets it all out with this thing. He shows Tarantino How Its Done. (Exploitation Biker flicks, that is.) Yes the acting is sometimes atrocious (but not always), and in many scenes, the heavyweight actors kind of flounder. This is because Bishop gave them "carte blanche" on account of being legends. Hopper and Carradine both got carte blanche. That is, Bishop didn't dare presume to write them a script. (This is all covered in the special features section.) He just explained the situation to them, how their characters should be feeling, and let them improvise. So yeah, some of the lines are cheesy, some are bad, some are cheesy bad, but every once in a while, a sardonic gem slips through. What saves this movie is the story. Its a straight up revenge tale, and don't you know them is the most satisfactory. Sure you got Madsen and Carradine and half the time it feels as if this were filmed on the back lot of the Kill Bill set - but that's just one more of its sick little charms, as far as I'm concerned. It was Madsen's idea to bring back the biker movie - - he's been trying to get someone to fund this, apparently. Larry Bishop and his big googly eyes is just cool. He knows his grindhouse, that much is obvious. Of course a movie like this will flop in our air conditioned, insulated, jet set environment; most of the criticisms leveled against it are precisely the reasons the movie was made in the first place. Its almost as if every scene includes something hyper-real in it, that is, something over the top not normally allowed in movies, but which reflect our reality a bit more honestly. All wrapped up in a slick package of fetishistic defiance. Let me just say that if this is a "flash in the pan", a one-off so to speak, it will have been worth it for this single movie alone, so we can all thank Quentin for taking the trouble to track Larry down and get him up off his ass and back into the grindhouse, where he belongs. And if it helps mark (along with Death Proof/Planet Terror) the veritable return of the exploitation flick to our cineplexes - - then that is reason to rejoice. So I guess its all good no matter how you slice and dice it.